Monday, August 27, 2007

Sofres Poll on Aoun popularity

While browsing the latest Lebanese news site, called NowLebanon, i found out this opinion poll made in early august (before the by-election) I found it interesting so here is the link and the most important results:

According to a recent Sofres poll, Lebanese Christians have become steadily more critical of opposition leader Michel Aoun since the escalation of Lebanon’s political crisis in January. Nevertheless, Aoun remains the most popular choice for president. Explaining this situation goes a long way to revealing Aoun’s political strengths and weaknesses.

According to the poll’s findings, the ongoing political deadlock has caused Aoun’s reputation to erode significantly among Christians. In a January Sofres poll, 50% of Christians stated that they had a favorable impression of Aoun, while 40% had a negative impression. By May, only 41% of Christians answered that they had a favorable opinion, and 52% had a negative opinion.

In contrast, March 14 leader Samir Geagea saw his favorability rating improve from 43% positive and 45% negative in January, to 54% positive and 40% negative in May.

The decline in Aoun’s reputation has been mirrored by a Christian shift toward March 14 in general. Christian support for March 14 grew from 35% in January to 42% in May, while support for March 8 shrunk slightly during the same time period, from 34% to 31%. 27% of Christians, however, still respond that they support neither March 8 nor March 14, a figure that has been relatively stable throughout the duration of the conflict.

The engine for this growing discontent seems to be Aoun’s alliance with Hezbollah. Many Christians are, and always have been, wary of the armed Shia group. When asked which party represented the greatest threat to them, 25% of Christians, a plurality, named Hezbollah. 55% of Christians favored the unconditional disarmament of Hezbollah in May – an increase from 47% two months prior. Disapproval of Aoun’s Memorandum of Understanding with Hezbollah has also increased recently, from 41% in March to 52% in May.

Aoun’s advisors should be telling him that his presidential chances remain good – but that his alliance with Hezbollah is causing him to slowly bleed Christian support. He is currently benefiting from divided Christian strength among the March 14 forces and the strong support base he built up before 2005. However, these are two rapidly-dissolving advantages: the March 14 coalition will likely soon unite around a presidential candidate, and the longer Aoun remains tied to groups like Hezbollah, the faster many Christians are going to forget about his past accomplishments.

8 comments :

JoseyWales said...

You forget that Hezbo and Syria will never ever accept him as prez (though they may have a hard PR time pulling away if need be).

BOB said...

totally agree!
and i can assure you that no matter what happens in Lebanon Aoun will never be president...

poshlemon said...

I am not concerned with whether Aoun gets elected as president or not. I don't care. However, I care that the president is representative of all Lebanese.

Again, not wishing to delve into details, I find the memorandum of understanding with Hezbollah an advantage. Hezbollah are a party to stay in Lebanon and they represent one of the largest groups in Lebanon, so why not? I think this understanding brings closer confessions rather than having this divide between christians versus muslims. So as not to say this understanding has alienated other confessions, many Druze, Greek Orthodox and Sunnis are supportive of it. I believe that the propaganda the March 14 bloc has been raging especially those aimed at instilling fear amongst the Christians are amongst the many reasons behind Aoun's decline. That I totally understand. However, the understanding with Hezbollah being the reason behind Aoun's decline, is something I can't understand.

Again, an opinion I currently feel is best suited, I find that Ja3ja3, Jemayel, Fatfat, Hariri, Jumblat and co. are not better representatives of what is better for Lebanon. Because in Lebanon we have two choices, I am inclined towars chosing the Aoun side.

BOB said...

Let em get this straight, when u say Lebanon has two choices (and i agree) u mean 14 March against Aoun? where does HA and * March fall in then? with Aoun?

in other words if the two choices were an alliance btw Iran-Syria or USA-FR-western world you will choose Iran-syria...

cause these are the two choices... and if you dont think that these are not the two choices what are they then?

Anonymous said...

Easy Bob, The choice is between Lebanon and USA(Israel really)

BOB said...

Of course...

you should rather say Iran or the western world...

and believe me each and every time i will choose the western world.

poshlemon said...

bob,

we disagree on this, I know.(I hate politics as it causes such animosity) But, we agree to disagree.

I would not like to say it is Syria/Iran versus west/USA. It may take on this image due to alliances or influences or affiliations. However, when I say 2 choices, I mean: HA/Aoun/allies versus March 14. With regards to ideology, political past/history, political opinions being expressed at the moment, I am definitely not in favor of March 14. Now don't get me wrong, I am not happy with both representatives. I would criticize both sides on endless notes. However, if I had to criticize one side less, it would be Aoun's side.

BOB said...

Poshlemon

hmmm we can't agree on everything now can we :)
Anyways at least to admit that Aoun can be criticized and he was involved int he civil war and its crimes (of coursed in a different and lesser level than some others...)

i think that once we agree on this the rest is easy. We either put the war and its atrocities behind us and never used in the current political crisis or we reopen ALL files and judge everyone...

But enough with hurling accusation on one side as if we are innocent of all what happened in those dark days...