Wednesday, December 20, 2006

Next year in taboo!


In the midst of this political deadlock, some Lebanese are feeling the brunt of these demonstrations/sit-ins more than others. And I am talking about the owners of businesses close the Riad el Solh and Al Azarieh squares, in Down Town Beirut.

Hezbollah’s sit-in made it impossible for many businesses to operate. Most of the night clubs in that area closed (Buddah Bar, Asia, Starlette and Taboo), and the parking lots that is currently housing the protestors’ tents are obviously out of business.

Of course, the welfare of hundreds of employee is not important to Hezbollah and its allies. As they are waging a crusade to rid Lebanon of this corrupt government and replace it with a clean one, which will eventually provide work for every men, women and child, solve all economic problems and enter Lebanon in a beneficial alliance with Iran and Syria!.

Meanwhile, many young Lebanese are emigrating by the hundreds if not thousands; because Hezbollah’s action has just cost them their jobs, or pushed to stop believing that their country will ever enjoy peace and stability!

However, throughout the ages the Lebanese people, have been known to continue on living and working even under the direst of circumstances. And last Saturday, the owner of Taboo, in Down Town Beirut, refused to accept the closer of his pub and decided to reopen it. His usual patrons heeded his call and choose to spend their Saturday night in Taboo.

Many versions describe what happened next; suffice to say that according to the most moderate one, the versions of the sole Lebanese English newspaper the DailyStar, which contacted the owner, reported that a scuffle happened early in the night between a client and some demonstrators. Then demonstrators started to protest angrily outside the pub, Hezbollah’s security intervened and placed a human shield to “protect” the pub.


At two o’clock in the morning, Hezbollah’s security decided that the situation was getting too dangerous and with the consent of the pub’s owner, they escorted all the client and staff to safety. On their way out Hezbollah’s security responsible asked the owner if he wanted to open the pub the next night, the owner sadly answered no.

Meanwhile the other versions spoke about a forceful closer of the pub by Hezbollah’s security, because drinking alcohol and women/men dancing together was against Islam, and the fact that Hezbollah staged the demonstration outside the pub to scare the night goers. Regardless which version we choose to believe the bottom line is that that area of Downtown Beirut is commercially dead, and all the employee that work there are without a job.

Second, it is not the Army or the ISF that are handling the security of that area; it is Hezbollah’s security apparatus. The same apparatus that fought Isreal two months ago, and controlled the southern Suburb of Beirut and many parts of the South, before the war. What are they doing in Downtown Beirut, and whom are they fighting I have no clue…

Finally, many will claim that 14th demonstration in 2005 had the same effect. Well I disagree. I was there in those glorious days and the demonstrations/sit- in took place around Martyr’s Square, which was not a private property, did not affect any business, lead to their forceful, or voluntarily closure.

I clearly remember that Virgin Megastore, which was five meters distant from the place where the 14th of March supporters placed their tents, was constantly open and life in DownTown Beirut’s many restaurant and pub was buzzing.

My answer to all this is that next year, Hezbollah or no Hezbollah I will party in Taboo!

20 comments :

Anonymous said...

>>Hezbollah’s sit-in...
Tst tst tst: it is NOT Hezbollah's sit in it is the OPPOSITION's sit in.
>>the versions of the sole
>>Lebanese English newspaper the
>>DailyStar
This newspaper is on the pentagon's payroll in exchange for articles such as this one and comments from americans (some who never came to Lebanon) like Geffrey Kemp, Michael Young...
>>many young Lebanese are
>>emigrating by the hundreds if
>>not thousands
Ultimetly this government is responsible by law for this: blame it, not the millions of people who are unhappy with its policies.
>>the parking lots that is
>>currently housing the
>>protestors’ tents are obviously
>>out of business.
Ok 6 syrians are out of job is this your problem?
>>Second, it is not the Army or
>>the ISF that are handling the
>>security of that area
It's been this way since independance, THAT is the problem.
>>Next year I will party in Taboo!
I will join you if we have a clean government!

BOB said...

Sam

You are totally minimizing the problem. It is not only about 6 Syrian workers, like you so untastefully put it. It is about hundreds of young Lebanese who are suddenly out of job. There is around 10 pubs/restaurants and there is at least 10 commerce in the area that are closed. Multiply this number by 20 and you can get an idea of how many people lost their jobs.

Next,
Stop blaming the government not everything is their mistake…
When you say clean, whom are you referring to? DO you want me to believe that the opposition leaders are not corrupt too??

Wow the dailystar is on the pentagon payroll. You care to share some kind of source or evidence about that? Or is this another one of your known facts that need no support!

And finally
Walaw!, you are putting conditions on having a drink with me? Walaw!!!

Anonymous said...

>>There is around 10 pubs/restaurants and there is at least 10 commerce in the area that are closed
Ok but this is indirect consequence: If we are in the tents we can't be in the pubs! That is why I strongly recommend the people who don't want to support the opposition to go there.
>>Stop blaming the government not everything is their mistake…
No, everything is not their mistake but they are ultimetly responsible. It's like a failing CEO of a company that blames his employees of been unhappy and for striking: everything might not be his fault but he IS responsible, and should either fix it or resign and let another CEO take care of it. "Il n y a pas de mauvaise armee il n'y a que de mauvais generaux" - Napoleon Bonaparte.
Amen!
>>You care to share some kind of source or evidence about that?
Sure they have a PUBLIC budget of tens of millions of dollars to "help and promote" free media and moderate voices (I hear pay for pro US stories)in the burgeoning "democracies" (I hear countries they are trying to control) of the Middle East!!(I can search for the exact text if you're interested).
You are saying it is moderate and the ONLY lebanese english ... I say it is a good candidate! Do I have an absolute proof: NO, do I have a doubt when I read some of their articles (and who writes them!!) Absolutely not a shadow of a doubt... but you have the right to think otherwise!
>>Walaw!, you are putting conditions on having a drink with me?
Very good point! I'm ashamed of myself. Seriously I would've loved to if I was in Lebanon (as well as boggers N10452 and Rampurple) maybe when I come for a visit...
God bless Lebanon!

Anonymous said...

Sam,

Are you blind by choice or simply born that way?

You talk about March 14th supporters being on the U.S. payroll?

Iran is pumping on average $200-500 million a year into Hezbollah's coffers along with a recent monetary boost of $300 million to rebuild the wartorn Shia dominated south of Lebanon ignoring other parts of the country [SOURCE: Hezbollah and Iran's own public statements]

The March 14th groups defend Lebanon based on what they believe and not on what they're paid to believe (i.e. opposition protesters).

You need to take a serious look at what side you're really on. Hez and company are looking to create an Iranian satellite country. Problem with that is that Iran has a bewildering 30% inflation (due much in part to these massive donations to militias throughout the world), 24% unemployment rate for the youth(12% on average), horrendous human rights abuses such as the case of an 18 year old girl named Nazanin who is now on death row for killing in self-defense one of three men who attempted to rape her and her niece.

Homelessness, Hopelessness, and Drug Addiction are rampant, but I guess as long as everyone prays and avoids alcohol and members of the opposite sex, it's a small price to pay, right?

Your arguments in favor of the Syrian owned and Iranian paid for opposition are as trivial and short sided as praising the Third Reich as they invaded one country after another because you think their swastika symbol "looks cool".

Your "profound social and political opposition movement" is nothing more than just another Iranian franchise.

You're a supporter of the located in Lebanon "McOpposition" run by store manager Nasrallah Hezbollah: "Would you like Katusha rockets with that?"

Al-Sadr runs the Iraq opposition to the tune of $100 million of month from the corporate office in Iran with new franchises opening soon in Palestine and Bahrain.

And to answer in advance one of your most likely counter arguments of: "But, Israel is the one that started the Lebanon War this past summer." C-102 Iranian missiles complete with on-site Republican Guard Battery Firing Units just don't suddenly appear.

If Israel didn't respond to the kidnappings, they would've launched one of those puppies into downtown Haifa to start the war.

You claim to be standing up for freedom, but the only thing you'll be free to do is suffer under their iron fisted rule.

May freedom and bright minds seize the day.

Anonymous said...

To anonymous,
First I never said that March 14th supporters being on the U.S. payroll (I was myself a supporter of March 14).
Second I'm not a member of HA
Third I'm not Iranian I'm Lebanese
(if you have a problem with Iran attack it directly please)
Fourth I will continue to support Hezbollah until the government heeds Hezbollah's call for putting in place a Lebanese army organised in a fashion (asymetrical warfare on top of the symetrical type of warfare) that enables it to face any israeli or other threat, when that happens we will not need Hezbollah's weapons.

Anonymous said...

In response to the "Four Tenants of Sam"

First - Sorry to hear that the actions of March 14th (since the event that gave them their names) have led you to denounce them.

Second - You say that you are not a member of HA, but you sure seem to be in spirit. You have to be able to see that their promises are just a ploy to gain favor and that if they were able to achieve their objective of gaining full power, you'd find out just how differently those promises would take shape compared to how you've interpreted them.

Third - I did not think you to be Iranian, and assumed you were Lebanese all along. I, myself, am of Czechoslovakian decent.

What I have witnessed unfold in Lebanon from the ouster of the Syrians to their movement to recapture it, is much like an event in 1968 referred to as the "Prague Spring" where a determined mass upheaval by the Czechs and Slovaks within their occupied country, stood up to their oppressors in favor of peace, prosperity, and freedom.

It seemed as though they had succeeded, but for only a moment.

This Lebanese-esque popular revolt was soon crushed by an 800,000 fold force of additional Soviet troops dispatched from Moscow. Thus ending and delaying freedom for another 20 some years.

Times have changed, and sending in uniformed soldiers in mass isn't an option for Syria and Iran.

So they instead send their army of oppression into Lebanon, cloaked and concealed under the guise of justice only to suck everyone back into the depths of feebleness and servitude.

I attack you because you seem to resemble those Czechoslovakians of that time that welcomed the return of Russian invaders after they destroyed that movement to live in harmony, telling all those concerned, that: "Don't worry, this time things will be different," "They have heard our concerns and will treat us better now."

The history that followed didn't see the fruition of those blindly optimistic assurances.

I attack you for your short memory.

Fourth - It is a valid concern to want to adapt the Lebanese military to being able to fight asymetrically. And given HA's history as an asymmetrical military group, they would sure seem to be an ideal lot to instruct the military on just how to go about it.

With their abundant wisdom, they would instruct future asymmetrical forces that one of the most important tactics is to "divide and conquer".

Exploit the differences of your enemy. Pry their government apart as best you can by exploiting whatever religious, ethnic, and political differences they have.

Make sure to supress all similar disputes in your own ranks. Silence all dissenters within by whatever means necessary, keeping the disagreements, conflicts of opinion, and so, on hidden from the light of day. This way you can always appear unified, and your enemy always fractured and in disharmony.

They could also tell you that one tactic is to attack sporadically, through assassinations of key figures from time to time. It isn't so important how many you kill, but how many you can make constantly afraid of being killed. That's where you will derive your asymetrical power from.

Another tactic is to come to the aid of those the targeted government has seemingly forgotten.

Appeal to them and make them your supporters. Campaign not as a group seeking to conquer and control, but rather as one who will step in and take care of everyone so benevolently.

An important note to remember is to never tell them how you'll go about doing this, since it is far easier to provide comfort to a small group versus to the population of an entire country. Especially since the laws that you plan to enact will wipe out a substantial portion of the economy making taking care of this increased "charity population" next to impossible.

Finally, once you've achieved power and all the promises you've made to the people you now control can no longer be attributed to the government you've just wiped out and lay fallow in the fields where peace and freedom once reigned with only you as their leader as the responsible party, find yourself someone to blame.

It can be either a nearby neighbor or a far away country, whether they be small or large, it doesn't really matter. Although they may or may not be a threat military, paint them as one.

So when your starving and downtrodden masses shriek out "We have no food!" "We have no jobs!" "We have no hope!"

You can reply calmly and confidently: "I would gladly give you all these things, but this other country keeps them from you and so it must be destroyed."

Now, I know you're probably thinking that I'm talking about Iran and Israel, and you're right.

But I'm also talking about the Soviet Union and the U.S., Napolean and the British Empire, Rome and Carthage, all the way back to civilizations that escape recollection.

It is only in democracy, this cycle ends. And the closest thing you have to one is March 14th.

Stand by them and work towards curing those actions they've taken in the past that made you react with such great offense that led to you no longer supporting them.

HA offers a doorway to a well traveled road where freedom, peace, and prosperity exists only as faint glimpse of the imagination.

Lebanon has known this path all too well, just as so many other civilizations before it.

Break the cycle and finally usher in the freedom you so rightly deserve.

BOB said...

Anonymous

Wow very nice overview.

I think that your response catch my feelings exactly...

Peace and keep on commenting

Anonymous said...

First I didn't denounce March 14 it denounced itself

Second - We will let the Lebanese voters determine who is best for Lebanon.

Third - Why don't you go back to Czechoslovakia and leave the Lebanese alone?

Four - Asymetrical tactic is a pure military strategy (guerilla type) not a political one.

Anonymous said...

Sam,

I thought I'd shed the "anonymous" title and go ahead and get an official blog name so we could converse on even footing.

RE: First - My point again is what does March 14th need to do to "un-denounce" itself in your opinion?

RE: Second - Letting the voters decide is always the best way to go about things, but it's not a fair vote when one side is threatening both covert and outright violence against the other group.

RE: Third - For starters, I don't have the financial means at my disposal to practice such globe trotting. Although, I'd like to visit Prague some day.

Let me also fill you in on the fact that "Czechoslovkia" no longer exists.

It was split into the Czech Republic(made up of Bohememians) and Slovakia(made up of Morovians), Following the end of the Soviet Union in the early 90's. I'm both part Czech and Slovak, so I can still call myself Czechoslovakian.

If it makes you feel any better, I also "bother" other countries throughout the world. Russia under Putin is a considerable concern for obvious historical reasons.

But I must say that Bob's Blog is the best I've come across for its diversity of opinion and level of intelligence and emotion in dealing with subject matter.

RE: Four(th) - Couldn't help but notice your comment under the next post: "Another botched job!"

It seems to follow the same subject, so I'll be posting the response to "Four(th) in addition to the other points you raised over there.

Anonymous said...

March 14th denounced itself by being represented by the same people who were allied with Syria and are now allied with another foreign power: the US.

Second - The Lebanese voters will decide freely!

Third - Since you told me that Chekoslovakia is such a great place, I tell you return to Czech Republic(made up of Bohememians)If you don't have the means send me your bank account and I'll be happy to send you some money so you can return live with your bohemian friends.

BOB said...

Sam

I said it before and I will say one last time, please no personal attacks or insinuations whatsoever. You have no right to even allude to Mike's country, his heritage or even to tell him to go back to his country.
This is a blog aimed at everyone, not restricted to Lebanese or anyone else. All comments and views are welcomed from any, and I stress ANY country, as long as you keep a minimum of civility and respect!

Peace

Anonymous said...

>>You have no right to even allude to Mike's country
Why not?
In fact what country is that?

BOB said...

Why not?

Would you like someone to tell you in an insulting way, when you are giving your opinion on country X to go back to your Lebanon and Lebanese friends, alluding that you are not welcome there??

Anonymous said...

Sam,

First issue - How can you fault March 14th for being aligned once with Syria, which HA is totally aligned with now?

And if you don't wan't to see March 14th aligned with the U.S., then it really only leaves Iran as a possible ally, which HA is also completely aligned with, and I'm assuming wouldn't be willing to share the cash with any other non-HA groups within Lebanon.

Second issue - The Lebanese voters already did decide, HA and it's allies withdrawing from the government wasn't something the voters called for, HA and company just up and did it on their own without the consent of the people.

Now that sounds pretty undemocratic to me.

Third issue - well, thank you for the generous offer of funds, but I don't think I'd be to comfortable with my bank account being filled with Iranian Riyals.

New issue of Slavic Mike's origin - Well, I'm from your very favorite all time country of the Estados Unidos de America (U.S.A)

I won't go into the details of my exact location to avoid the ire of some of those pesky Iranian intelligence operatives they have over here who like to hunt down dissidents of the regime.

Shall we continue this conversation on the next post?

Anonymous said...

>>Would you like someone to tell you in an insulting way, when you are giving your opinion on country X to go back to your Lebanon and Lebanese friends
If I'm lecturing them about how wonderful Lebanon is the answer is: YES!

BOB said...

Sam

Good for you! But fortunately not everybody think like you, so for the last time refrain from any personal insinuations or attacks. Thx!

Anonymous said...

Bob, you keep using the words "Insinuations" and "allude" and so forth and I have no idea what you are talking about. I'm far from being perfect but insinuating is not really my thing if anything I'm too frank and obvious. So please can you tell me where and what I'm trying to insinuate (I don't even know myself!!)?

BOB said...

Sam

First, u said this "Why don't you go back to Czechoslovakia and leave the Lebanese alone?"
and i concluded that you do not care about Mike's opinion. However i do, and many other reader too!

So bringing up the subject of Mike origin again and again is becoming tedious and borderline insulting, leave it alone. You do not agree with his views discuss them not him!!!! Discuss his ideas not his origin!!!!!!!

Anonymous said...

Ok I can see how that is not being "fairplay" or nice but I was not trying to insinuate anything.

Anonymous said...

--Look for additional comments by Slavic Mike on newer threads, I will no longer post comments under this subject--

It's difficult to keep track of arguments on multiple threads so I'm going to post comments/replies on the most recent ones.

Just trying to keep it all relevant and cohesive.